Hi, X

On the whole, you have done a great work writing the page and finding information, 
but you need to find better information, and you need to adapt it as we explained in class: 
http://olmo.pntic.mec.es/~pmai0016/european_section/webworkshop/faqs.htm#9
You can also improve the design as I explain below.

These are your marks:

Navigation: 2 marks
The links work all right

Content: -1 marks
No HDI, historical information is incomplete, no interesting information about the country. 
The "geographical" information should be in the first section of the page, because it concerns 
the population and area; however, the countries that you compare it with are not very well known for us, 
so the comparison is not very useful. You could compare the data for Malaysia to Spain or Spanish regions.

In theory your marks for this section is 1, but in fact your marks is -1 because the text is mostly copied 
(see the assessment criteria: http://olmo.pntic.mec.es/~pmai0016/european_section/webworkshop/evaluation.htm).

Language: -1 marks.

Some of the sentences are more or less correctly translated, but many are copied literally 
(for example, the first paragraph of the historical information is copied from wikipedia, 
and the second paragraph is copied from another page which is not in the list of sources, 
the same as some of the information about the economy, which comes from a different page, too). 
It is a good thing that you use information from several different pages, but you must write 
all the addresses in the sources section.

Sometimes you copy part of one sentence and part of another and put them together, 
but their grammar doesn't match (for example, you copied "into two similarly sized regions, 
Peninsular Malaysia and Malaysian Borneo" from wikipedia, but then you wrote an introduction: 
"It consist" with a verb that does not take the preposition "into" —you need to use "in" or "of" 
after "consist", depending on what you mean: "consists of" = "consta de"; "consists in" = "consiste en").

Design: 1 mark.
You have used plenty of images and they aren't too big, there are also lots of maps, 
which show all the necessary information; however, the one with the line to India is too small 
and it does not show any information which is not in other maps. Also, the paragraphs and titles 
in the sources section are wrong: the titles of two paragraphs are right under the previous paragraphs, 
they should be separated from them.

Total marks: 1

Juan José